Bharath Vissapragada has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: IMPALA-3680: Cleanup the scan range state after failed hdfs 
cache reads
......................................................................


Patch Set 6:

(4 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3313/6//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

PS6, Line 13: endup
> Typo: "endup"
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3313/6/testdata/cluster/node_templates/common/etc/hadoop/conf/hdfs-site.xml.tmpl
File testdata/cluster/node_templates/common/etc/hadoop/conf/hdfs-site.xml.tmpl:

PS6, Line 88:     <value>1073741824</value>
> Is this a reasonable default value for our minicluster, or is this needed o
Currently only test_hdfs_caching_fallback_path  caches a larger table (~120MB). 
(This is to test a specific code path that was untested before), So ideally I 
can reduce it to say 200MB and still get the work done. As such I don't see any 
risks of changing this as it is quite common in any deployment that intends to 
use hdfs caching.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3313/6/tests/query_test/test_hdfs_caching.py
File tests/query_test/test_hdfs_caching.py:

PS6, Line 105: get_random_id(5))
> Instead of this, you could use the "testid_checksum" fixture, along with a 
Done


PS6, Line 114: execute_query
> execute_query_expect_success() here and in other places?
Done


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/3313
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0a9ea19dd8571b01d2cd5b87da1c259219f6297a
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Project: Impala
Gerrit-Branch: cdh5-trunk
Gerrit-Owner: Bharath Vissapragada <bhara...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bharath Vissapragada <bhara...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Hecht <dhe...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Knupp <dkn...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Brown <mi...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to