Hi, +1, we will only pick bug-fix commits to 0.8.x, PRs that are not compatible with 0.8.0 will go to 0.9.
Best, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> > 发送时间: 2019-09-19 23:07:16 (星期四) > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" <dev@iotdb.apache.org> > 抄送: > 主题: AW: Reminding of changes in RPC > > Totally agree. This should be considered a change not just a fix and thus be > in a version 0.9.x but not in 0.8.x > > Julian > > Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet > > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Betreff: Re: Reminding of changes in RPC > Von: 徐毅 > An: dev@iotdb.apache.org > Cc: > > Hi, > > > Change definitions in rpc.thrift should be careful. > For example, you have jdbc with 0.8.0 and iotdb with 0.8.1 whose > rpc.thrit are a little bit different. It is most likely that you cannot use > jdbc with 0.8.0 to connect iotdb with 0.8.1 since they are not compatible. > This may confuse our users why two 0.8.x are not compatible？ > > > Therefore, i would suggest that if there is no great improvement, the > original definitions should be remained. > > > Thanks > XuYi > > > On 9/19/2019 20:03，孙泽嵩<sz...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> wrote： > Hi, > > > I have renamed some variable and struct names in RPC in PR [1]: > Rename TS_Status to TSStatus; > Rename TS_StatusType to TSStatusType; > Use TSStatus to replace TSRPCRsp. (Since it only contains TSStatus field) > > > If you are working on JDBC or session, please pull latest master code to > avoid more conflicts. > > > Besides, if any people changed RPC, remember to maintain the file > `rpc-changelist.md` in service-rpc module. It is helpful for other developers > : ) > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/404 > > > > > BR, > > > -- > Zesong Sun > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 孙泽嵩 > 清华大学 软件学院
