Greeting~ I??m working on this issue and I will fix naming in [https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/blob/bd2992438208a6c2379848cd4224ac04bdd475d1/spark-iotdb-connector/src/main/scala/org/apache/iotdb/spark/db/Transformer.scala#L95] For more detailed naming convention in https://docs.scala-lang.org/style/naming-conventions.html#constants-values-variable-and-methods. If someone is interested in this issue, he / she can fix it easily. Welcome to join us and submit your own pr!
------------------ ???????? ------------------ ??????: "Yuan Tian (Jira)"<[email protected]>; ????????: 2019??11??6??(??????) ????8:28 ??????: "dev"<[email protected]>; ????: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-293) Variable naming convention francisdu created IOTDB-293: ------------------------------- Summary: Variable naming convention Key: IOTDB-293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-293 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: francisdu Fix For: 0.8.0, 0.9.0 I think Scala should follow the variable naming convention in Java.PM should do code review.[spark-iotdb-connector] : [https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/blob/bd2992438208a6c2379848cd4224ac04bdd475d1/spark-iotdb-connector/src/main/scala/org/apache/iotdb/spark/db/Transformer.scala#L95] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
