Just a proposal. Like that we fetch the data of COVID-2019 and show them in the website of IoTDB.
We could run the rcs in this case for about one week or longer before release to confirm that the binary is ok. Maybe we could use several different loads in the same time. Such as public data of weather, earthquake. Thanks! runhus...@foxmail.com From: Xiangdong Huang Date: 2020-07-16 16:25 To: dev Subject: Re: [discuss] Long term test in IoTDB code repo Hi , > I think we should have a sandbox to run the iotdb in long term write and read too. Yes. Do you have a detailed plan or idea? Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 runhus...@foxmail.com <runhus...@foxmail.com> 于2020年7月13日周一 下午7:39写道: > Good idea! > > I think we should have a sandbox to run the iotdb in long term write and > read too. > > This will help us found the stable problem of iotdb. > > > > Thanks! > > runhus...@foxmail.com > > > From: Xiangdong Huang > Date: 2020-07-13 16:33 > To: dev > Subject: [discuss] Long term test in IoTDB code repo > Hi, > > I am considering adding a module for long term test in IoTDB code repo. > > Sometimes when we developing new features or improvements, we may consider > different aspects, e.g., the performance, the memory cost, the cpu cost > etc.. > And, these test may need to be run for a long time to obverse the system > stability. > > So, I think we can add a new module in our repo for doing that. > e.g., add a new profile called long-term-test, and only using `mvn -P > long-term-test` to run the test. > > I can modify the maven pom file, but we also need add some > basic functionality, e.g., monitoring the memory cost, cpu cost and time > cost. > > Notice, we are using github.com/thulab/iotdb-benchmark for testing IoTDB > now. this new module is not for replacing the benchmark. > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 >