Hi all, as the result, we got 7 * +1 for `extreme` 2 * +1 for `extreme_value` or `ext_value` 1 * -1 for `ext`
Since `ext` is not very intuitive and `extreme_value` may be too long. Therefore, we decided to use `extreme`. Jiajun Liu <liujiajun1...@gmail.com> 于2021年6月3日周四 下午12:44写道： > +1 extreme_value > +0 extreme > -1 ext > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 9:55 AM, Mark Liu <manlge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for extreme > > > > Xiangwei Wei <wxw19981...@gmail.com> 于2021年6月2日周三 上午10:50写道： > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > We plan to add a new aggregation function, whose function is to take > the > > > extreme value, that is, to return the maximum absolute value (the > > preferred > > > positive value). The typical use scenario is the vibration amplitude of > > the > > > bridge. > > > It has been contributed by @Liu Yu ~[1]. > > > > > > One of the issues that we need to discuss with you is the name of this > > > aggregate function. At present, it is called `ext`, for example, > ext(s1). > > > We should take a name which is intuitive and easy to understand. > > > Alternative options: > > > 1. ext > > > 2. extreme > > > 3. ext_value > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/3289 > > > -- > > > Best, > > > Xiangwei Wei > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best, > > ----------------------------------- > > Mark Liu > > > -- Best, Xiangwei Wei
