Changing the default port will affect a lot...

If really want to change, better to warm-up in a long time and then
change it in v1.0.

Or, start two ports in several versions.

Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University

 黄向东
清华大学 软件学院

HW-Chao Wang <576749...@qq.com> 于2021年6月10日周四 下午9:05写道:
>
> +1, support change default port.
> After the cluster version is deployed, the port cannot be modified. 
> Therefore, the default port should be planned before deployment.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------&nbsp;原始邮件&nbsp;------------------
> 发件人:                                                                          
>                                               "dev"                           
>                                                          
> <neuyi...@163.com&gt;;
> 发送时间:&nbsp;2021年6月10日(星期四) 晚上8:53
> 收件人:&nbsp;"dev@iotdb.apache.org"<dev@iotdb.apache.org&gt;;
>
> 主题:&nbsp;Re: [DISCUSS] Share a strange case: 6667 port may be considered as 
> IRC port
>
>
>
> Hi,
> +1 for change the default port.
> And thanks for Chao post the port list which may have potential problems.
>
>
> Thanks,
> ---------------------------------------
> Houliang Qi
> BONC, Ltd
>
>
> On 06/10/2021 20:20,Chao Wang<ccgow...@163.com&gt; wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> change a port? Maybe we could avoid choosing the port in 
> https://web.mit.edu/rhel-doc/4/RH-DOCS/rhel-sg-en-4/ch-ports.html.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Chao Wang
> BONC ltd
> ccgow...@163.com
> On 6/10/2021 19:32,Haonan Hou<hhao...@outlook.com&gt; wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently we occur a strange case, a user can not connect to an IoTDB server,
> but when he changes his network to a clean environment, everything is fine.
>
> It may be caused that 6667 port is considered as IRC port.
>
> The issue is here. [1] Please share any idea about it.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/issues/3386
>
> Best,
> Haonan Hou
> Sent from my iPhone

Reply via email to