+1 for SimpleConsensus OneCopy may be ambiguous. SimpleConsensus naming is friendly for new user.
Thanks, Gaofei Cao Jialin Qiao <qiaojia...@apache.org> 于2022年11月2日周三 16:08写道： > > +1 for SimpleConsensus > > OneCopy may cause confuse, Users may treat one replica as OneCopy. > > Or treat OneCopy as two replicas ( one primary + one copy) > > Thanks, > Jialin Qiao > > > On 2022/11/02 04:14:52 Haonan Hou wrote: > > +1 for SimpleConsensus. > > > > Cassandra has a similar `SimpleStrategy`. > > See > > https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/4.1/cassandra/architecture/dynamo.html#simple-strategy > > > > Best, > > Haonan Hou > > > > > On Oct 31, 2022, at 9:32 PM, Jialin Qiao <qiaojia...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > +1 for OneReplicaConsensus > > > ————————————————— > > > Jialin Qiao > > > Apache IoTDB PMC > > > > > > Yuan Tian <jackietie...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月31日周一 20:08写道： > > >> > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> After discussing, we think OneCopyConsensus may be better. So I rename > > >> it to OneCopyConsensus in this pr > > >> https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/7832/files > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> ---------------- > > >> Yuan Tian > > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:39 PM Yuan Tian <jackietie...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi, all > > >>> > > >>> Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single > > >>> replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as > > >>> StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used > > >>> for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version). > > >>> > > >>> So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates: > > >>> > > >>> 1. OneCopyConsensus > > >>> 2. NoCopyConsensus > > >>> 3. SimpleConsensus > > >>> 4. ZereCostConsensus > > >>> > > >>> Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you > > >>> voted for? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Best, > > >>> -------------- > > >>> Yuan Tian > > > >
