We will have the corresponding fat-jar when the version is released. Locally, if developing JDBC seems to add jar-with-dependencies manually, it is not troublesome. Of course, we can also consider adding fat-jar to JDBC in distribution.
Xuan Best regards, Xuan Wang ________________________________ From: Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 7:42:40 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [DISCUSS] Make enabling "fat-jars" the default for the JDBC module? Hi all, so right now, I keep on having the issue, that I keep on needing to re-build IoTDB, as I forgot to enable the “jar-with-dependencies” profile when building the JDBC driver. I would assume, that when building a native Java client, someone would possibly prefer using the session API and that JDBC is more needed when using IoTDB from a JDBC enabled client. So, I think it would be better to have the fat-jar enabled per default. What do you others think? Chris
