Hi, Caiyin

Following Wenwei's work, we plan to introduce an 
iotdb-system.properties.template file that will contain all configuration 
items, relevant comments, and optional settings, similar to the latest user 
configuration manual. In the future, the iotdb-system.properties file will only 
include explicitly configured items by the user (such as IP addresses or 
manually configured storage engine parameters). Compared to the current method 
of finding and modifying configurations in the lengthy 
iotdb-confignode.properties and iotdb-datanode.properties files, this approach 
seems more convenient. If you have any good ideas, feel free to discuss your 
preferred method further!

Best
------------
Xinyu Tan

On 2024/06/01 09:18:48 ycy wi wrote:
> Hi wenwei,
> 
> I am curious whether this will ultimately lead to an oversized or redundant 
> configuration file. I might just want to modify some configuration items in 
> the dataNode. In theory, I only need to pay attention to the configuration 
> items in iotdb-datanode.properties. Will the merge cause any confusion due to 
> similar configuration items in iotdb-confignode.properties?
> 
> Best
> CaiyinYang
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 2024年5月31日 21:20,wenwei shu <[email protected]> 写道:
> > 
> > Hello everyone,
> > 
> > I am Wenwei Shu, a new contributor to Apache IoTDB. Recently, we are
> > working on merging `iotdb-confignode.properties`,
> > `iotdb-datanode.properties` and `iotdb-common.properties` into a new
> > `iotdb-system.properties` file. For old version users who upgrade to a new
> > version, if they don't create the new configuration file themselves during
> > the upgrade, IoTDB will generate the new configuration file based on
> > several old configuration files after it is started. You can check this PR
> > to get more details: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/12570.
> > Thank you for your reading.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Wenwei Shu
> 
> 

Reply via email to