Hi Chris,

I think the table model can be considered a milestone event for IoTDB.
Although we have designed it to be compatible with the tree model, we still
want to convey to users through a major version number that this is a
significant update, rather than a routine version release. Best regards,
------------------
Yuan Tian

On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 3:41 PM Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:

> Usually major version upgrades introduce breaking changes. As far as I
> understood it, it just adds features. That would qualify for a second digit
> increase.
>
> If we do a major version bump we should also consider doing some other
> refactoring, that we postponed till the next major release.
>
> Chris
>
> Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ________________________________
> From: Yuan Tian <jackietie...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2024 7:37:21 AM
> To: dev <dev@iotdb.apache.org>
> Subject: Upgrading version from 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT to 2.0.0-SNAOSHOT for
> master branch
>
> Hi all,
>
> Given the significant changes that the table model introduces to IoTDB and
> the associated upgrade from TsFile version V3 to V4, it is reasonable to
> consider updating the version on the master branch to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT. This
> approach aligns with the intention to release the table model with the
> version number 2.0.0, signifying a major update to the system.
>
> For the tree model, which will continue to evolve with bug fixes and
> performance improvements on the 1.X.X series (such as the upcoming 1.3.3
> version), it's important to maintain clear versioning to differentiate
> between the stable, incremental updates and the more substantial changes
> introduced by the table model. What do you think? Best regards,
>
> ------------------------
>
> Yuan Tian
>

Reply via email to