b +1 Jialin Qiao
Xinyu Tan <tanxi...@apache.org> 于2024年9月2日周一 10:33写道： > > Hi > > I prefre b. > > I think it's more right to be compatible with users of the tree model and to > be consistent with relational databases for the table model. Aligning the > table and tree aligned time series semantically is something that can be > sacrificed. > > Best > ------------- > Xinyu Tan > > On 2024/09/02 01:51:39 Yuan Tian wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As we discussed in [1], we need to decide whether to automatically filter > > out rows that are entirely null in the result set during a scan by the > > storage engine. > > > > There are three reasonable options: > > > > [a] keep table model same as tree model ( automatically filter out rows > > that are entirely null ) > > [b] table model don't automatically filter out rows that are entirely null, > > but keep the tree model same as before. > > [c] table model and aligned time series in tree model don't automatically > > filter out rows that are entirely null, but keep nonAligned time series in > > tree model same as before > > > > > > Personally, I prefer [c], because in the storage engine, table model shares > > the same things as aligned time series in tree model, [b] will break it up > > while scanning. > > > > Feel free to vote for the option you personally want to choose. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/40gk1k1q3styjsf4s95ydlm5f2l2lcr4 > > > > > > Best regards, > > -------------------------- > > Yuan Tian > >
