I'm happy to hear this is likely not a problem!

It is ASF policy to work on security issues in private 
(https://apache.org/security/committers.html#work-in-private). As such, in the 
future, please discuss those on priv...@iotdb.apache.org with Cc to 
secur...@apache.org.


Kind regards,

Arnout Engelen
ASF Security

On 2024/10/02 03:22:26 Yuan Tian wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> About CVE-2024-24780[1][2], I think it may not be a problem in IoTDB.
> 
> The permission to create UDFs is a high-level privilege in IoTDB, and by
> default, only the root user has it in IoTDB. Therefore, we believe that
> users with this privilege should be responsible for the security of the
> cluster. Moreover:
> 
>    1. Even if we disable the function of loading JAR packages from remote
>    URIs, people with the corresponding permissions can still copy risky JAR
>    packages to the local disk of the server where the cluster is located and
>    load them.
>    2. Even if we add a whitelist configuration, people who can log in to
>    the server where the cluster is located can also modify the whitelist
>    configuration items, rendering it ineffective.
> 
> 
> Therefore, I believe that maintaining the status quo will not pose a
> security risk.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> [1] https://cveprocess.apache.org/cve5/CVE-2024-24780
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/8logyynghs3s0qsp9lq7tbtyv6llmpvp
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> -----------------------------
> Yuan Tian
> 

Reply via email to