[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jeroen van der Wal updated ISIS-845:
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: core-1.7.0)
                   core-1.8.0

> Hidden (Where.REFERENCES_PARENT) should take into account the instance that 
> is the parent, not just its type.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-845
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: core-1.6.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>             Fix For: core-1.8.0
>
>
> For example:
> PartyRelationship {
>     fromParty;
>     toParty;
> }
> if rendered from the point of view of the from party, would want to show only 
> the toParty.  But adding this annotation causes both properties to be 
> suppressed.
> This can be seen in the code:
>     static Filter<ObjectAssociation> associationDoesNotReferenceParent(final 
> ObjectSpecification parentSpec) {
>         if(parentSpec == null) {
>             return Filters.any();
>         }
>         return new Filter<ObjectAssociation>() {
>             @Override
>             public boolean accept(ObjectAssociation association) {
>                 final HiddenFacet facet = 
> association.getFacet(HiddenFacet.class);
>                 if(facet == null) {
>                     return true;
>                 }
>                 if (facet.where() != Where.REFERENCES_PARENT) {
>                     return true;
>                 }
>                 final ObjectSpecification assocSpec = 
> association.getSpecification();
>                 final boolean associationSpecIsOfParentSpec = 
> parentSpec.isOfType(assocSpec);
>                 final boolean isVisible = !associationSpecIsOfParentSpec;
>                 return isVisible;
>             }
>         };
>     }
> Instead, the code should take into account the actual instance that is 
> referenced, not just the type (ie look at the object that the association 
> points back to).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to