[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14739144#comment-14739144
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ISIS-1194:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 97eed79626f6ee691333ff547d5057beb4a693a2 in isis's branch 
refs/heads/ISIS-1194 from [~danhaywood]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=isis.git;h=97eed79 ]

ISIS-1194: pass PojoAdapter to PersistenceSession, rather than use IsisContext 
(and don't pass in AdapterManager)

Also:
- tidy up of comments/regions
- inlining of getters to dependencies used only internally


> Remove dead code, remove support for @Aggregated, for 
> isDirty/clearDirty/markDirty.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-1194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1194
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> removed ResolveState concept, instead derive state from underlying pojo
> - services and view models implicitly always persistent
> removed support for manual dirtying of objects:
> - isDirty
> - clearDirty
> - markDirty.
> removed support for @Aggregated:
> - Any @Aggregated will be picked up by the metamodel validation.  
> - attempting to call DomainObjectContainer#newAggregatedInstance(...) will 
> throw an exception.
> - ObjectAdapter#isAggregated removed
> - @Embedded annotation is no longer picked up as aggregated (is simply 
> ignored)
> simplified Oid hierarchy
> - RootOid
> - ParentedCollectionOid
> simplified PojoRecreator, IdentifierGenerator and PersistAlgorithm
> - no longer have two impementations
> - use the DataNucleus impl always (and remove unnecessary interface)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to