I've just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17745 for
this task, referencing this thread as lazy consensus.

Thx

On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 19:53, Kevin Meyer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> I agree with the assumption of lazy consensus, but I give my formal
> consent anyway.
>
> I agree with the move.
>
> I agree that you can go ahead and create the JIRA ticket, as/when you wish.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> --
> Kevin Meyer
> Vice President Apache Isis (https://isis.apache.org)
> The Apache Software Foundation
>
>
> On Thu, January 3, 2019 14:59, Dan Haywood wrote:
> > As per Infra's email below, let's use this email thread to ensure
> > consensus that it is okay for this repo to be migrated to gitbox.
> >
> > To explain what's going on here...
> >
> >
> > we have two git repos, the main one (isis.git) on github, and the one for
> >  our site (isis-site.git) that is still on git-wip-us.apache.org.
> >
> > The isis-site.git repo actually just holds the generated website.  When I
> >  build the site locally, I copy over the generated HTML and PDFs into
> > this isis-site, and push; that causes the site to be published to
> > isis.apache.org .
> >
> >
> > Infra's mention of gitbox.apache.org is basically the bit of magic that
> > (I
> > think) sets up some sort of trust relationship so that the github-hosted
> > repo is the canonical repo for our project rather than a repo hosted on
> > an apache.org server.  We already did this for isis.git, but haven't yet
> > done so for isis-git.org.
> >
> > I'm going to assume lazy consensus on this  .... unless I hear otherwise
> > I'll assume that everyone is okay for us to ask infra to migrate
> > isis-site.git over to github.  The only impact is for anyone who builds
> > and publishes the isis website, which so far, has only ever been me, I
> > think.
> >
> > But, if you do have issues, then do raise them here.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: Apache Infrastructure Team <[email protected]>
> > Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 13:19
> > Subject: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to
> > gitbox.apache.org To: <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello, isis folks.
> > As stated earlier in 2018, all git repositories must be migrated from
> > the git-wip-us.apache.org URL to gitbox.apache.org, as the old service
> is
> > being decommissioned. Your project is receiving this email because you
> > still have repositories on git-wip-us that needs to be migrated.
> >
> > The following repositories on git-wip-us belong to your project:
> > - isis-site.git
> >
> >
> >
> > We are now entering the mandated (coordinated) move stage of the roadmap,
> >  and you are asked to please coordinate migration with the Apache
> > Infrastructure Team before February 7th. All repositories not migrated
> > on February 7th will be mass migrated without warning, and we'd
> appreciate
> >  it if we could work together to avoid a big mess that day :-).
> >
> > Moving to gitbox means you will get full write access on GitHub as well,
> > and be able to close/merge pull requests and much more.
> >
> > To have your repositories moved, please follow these steps:
> >
> >
> > - Ensure consensus on the move (a link to a lists.apache.org thread will
> > suffice for us as evidence). - Create a JIRA ticket at
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
> >
> >
> > Your migration should only take a few minutes. If you wish to migrate
> > at a specific time of day or date, please do let us know in the ticket.
> >
> > As always, we appreciate your understanding and patience as we move
> > things around and work to provide better services and features for the
> > Apache Family.
> >
> >
> > Should you wish to contact us with feedback or questions, please do so
> > at: [email protected].
> >
> >
> >
> > With regards,
> > Apache Infrastructure
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to