Hi, On 5/25/06, Nicolas Toper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
About Tobias ProxyPM: I am ok to write it although it is out of scope of the initial project, you all seem to really need it, so let's go for it. Jukka?
This is something that we should look at later on. Modifying the internal persistence data path is quite risky in terms of possible new bugs and regressions so I'd rather not extend the scope of the SoC project to cover that. I'd be happy with just a global write lock that guarantees data consistency in the repository. For the SoC project I'd even be OK with a tool that simply relies on the administrator to enforce a no-write policy during backup. It's still better than we have now and we can extend and improve the solution later on. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
