Thanks for your quick reply. In what way does it violate the contract? Should the PersistenceManager suspend the ongoing transaction and start it's own?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Guggisberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 2:02 PM > To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org > Subject: Re: FW: jta transaction without using jca > > > On 10/6/06, Magnus Grimsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I sent this to the user list but didn't get any response so > I try the dev list :) > > > > I rewrote JNDIDatabasePersistenceManager a little bit so it > doesn't do it's own commits. > > This works fine and persistence manager and file system now > participates in the gloabl transaction. > > If there is any interest I can send a patch with this > behaviour optional. > > this behaviour does violate the contract of the > PersistenceManager interface and > almost certainly leads to inconsistent internal repository state when > such a global transaction is rolled back. > > cheers > stefan > > > > > I guess the problem left is the search index which is > stored on disc. I've used Compass in a recent project > > and it stores the lucene index in the database. Is there > any plans for jackrabbit to support that too? > > > > /Magnus > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Magnus Grimsell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:03 AM > > > To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org > > > Subject: jta transaction without using jca > > > > > > > > > I would like to configure jackrabbit with db based file > > > system and persistence manager that participates in the > > > ongoing jta transaction. > > > I tried out the JNDIDatabasePersistenceManager but since it > > > does explicit commits i ran into trouble. > > > > > > Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: The method 'commit' cant be > > > called when a global transaction is active. > > > at > > > oracle.oc4j.sql.spi.ConnectionHandle.oc4j_throwSQLExceptionIfG > > > lobalTxActive(ConnectionHandle.java:407) > > > at > > > > oracle.oc4j.sql.spi.ConnectionHandle.commit(ConnectionHandle.java:122) > > > at > > > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.db.DatabasePersistenceManager > > > .store(DatabasePersistenceManager.java:339) > > > > > > I've read that you are supposed to use JCA to enable > > > jackrabbit to participate in JTA transactions. However, since > > > our product must > > > work on a bunch of different application servers I'm a little > > > hesitant to introduce this new requirement. > > > > > > Has anybody used JTA and jackrabbit without using JCA? > > > > > > Magnus Grimsell > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >
