[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-352?page=comments#action_12450661 ]
Topi Westerholm commented on JCR-352:
-------------------------------------
Is there an error in the patch file? It seems that following the correction
logic the next segment (NodeIndexer.java) should have a "Field.Store.NO" at the
first parameter.
true=Field.Store.YES ?
false=Field.Store.NO ?
/**
@@ -416,9 +416,9 @@
}
doc.add(new Field(FieldNames.PROPERTIES,
FieldNames.createNamedValue(fieldName, pathString),
- false,
- true,
- false));
+ Field.Store.YES,
+ Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED,
+ Field.TermVector.NO));
}
> Upgrade to Lucene 2.0
> ---------------------
>
> Key: JCR-352
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-352
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: indexing
> Affects Versions: 1.0, 0.9, 1.0.1
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Michael Young
> Assigned To: Jukka Zitting
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.2
>
> Attachments: lucene2-pom.xml.patch, lucene2-project.xml.patch,
> lucene2.patch
>
>
> We would like to upgrade to Lucene 1.9.1. There are jar conflicts when
> integrating with other projects such as Liferay Portal -- which uses v 1.9.1.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
