Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
On 3/14/07, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- is this a TODO? (the code in JCR2SPI's SessionImpl seems to indicate that...) - if it is, should we define an extension to SimpleCredentials that can hold the required information, so that we don't rely on a specific impl class?
since we've left the specifics of the 'impersonate' mechanism up to the implementation we don't know what is required to identify an impersonating session. an extension to SimpleCredentials would therefore not help since it implies username/password credentials.
based on this 'impersonating' has simply be added to the SPI (RepositoryService), since the jcr2spi is obviously not able to know how a particular implementation handles the impersonation. bref, shouldn't be an issue any more regards angela
