Hi, On 6/15/07, Thomas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And after a crash, you can re-index everything, then things are consistent and no data is lost (only time is lost). So solving the transactional problem of the index is not highest priority. Still it would be nice to have a clean solution.
Related to NGP, I had this wishful thought that we could perhaps integrate Lucene segment files with the NGP revision model, so that the index update would actually become a part of a persisted revision... I guess that would require a whole new level of integration between Jackrabbit and Lucene, but it would be nice to see what we could achieve in case there's interest within both projects. BR, Jukka Zitting
