[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christoph Kiehl updated JCR-974:
--------------------------------
Attachment: patch.txt
This is a first patch which uses a FieldCache per index segment. To make this
work we had to use our own implementation of FieldCache.StringIndex which does
not keep an array of sort indexes for the document, but which keeps an array
terms associated which each document. This of course uses more memory and there
need to be some performance/scaling tests done.
We had to modify SearchIndex.CombinedIndexReader and CachingMultiReader to
allow access to the underlying IndexReaders because those IndexReaders are used
as cache keys in SharedFieldCache.
I'm not absolutely satisfied about this solution, because
SharedFieldSortComparator has to know that there is a CombinedIndexReader and
currently even assumes it.
Performance wise we achieved a speed up by factor 5-15 in our current
application where we have got a lot of write operations and more than 1000000
nodes . For read-only repositories this patch slightly degrades performance by
a factor of about 2.
> Manage Lucene FieldCaches per index segment
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-974
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-974
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Christoph Kiehl
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> Jackrabbit uses an IndexSearcher which searches on a single IndexReader which
> is most likely to be an instance of CachingMultiReader. On every search that
> does sorting or range queries a FieldCache is populated and associated with
> this instance of a CachingMultiReader. On successive queries which operate on
> this CachingMultiReader you will get a tremendous speedup for queries which
> can reuse those associated FieldCache instances.
> The problem is that Jackrabbit creates a new CachingMultiReader _everytime_
> one of the underlying indexes are modified. This means if you just change
> _one_ item in the repository you will need to rebuild all those FieldCaches
> because the existing FieldCaches are associated with the old instance of
> CachingMultiReader.
> This does not only lead to slow search response times for queries which
> contains range queries or are sorted by a field but also leads to massive
> memory consumption (depending on the size of your indexes) because there
> might be multiple instances of CachingMultiReaders in use if you have a
> scenario where a lot of queries and item modifications are executed
> concurrently.
> The goal is to keep those FieldCaches as long as possible.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
