[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Christoph Kiehl resolved JCR-1058. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate > Index segment lost after consistency check > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: JCR-1058 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1058 > Project: Jackrabbit > Issue Type: Bug > Components: indexing > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Reporter: Christoph Kiehl > Assignee: Christoph Kiehl > Priority: Critical > > On one of our server it seems like a whole index segment got lost because all > nodes that were added just before the crash where not in the index anymore an > we got this in out log file: > [2007-07-06 10:52:08,067, INFO ] {} > he.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.Recovery:86: Redo changes applied. > [2007-07-06 10:52:08,073, INFO ] {} > jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex:298: Running consistency check... > [2007-07-06 10:52:09,495, INFO ] {} > jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger:268: merged 3710 documents in 1384 > ms into _2j2f. > [2007-07-06 10:59:30,600, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:160: progress: 10% > [2007-07-06 11:06:45,543, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:160: progress: 20% > [2007-07-06 11:13:42,292, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:160: progress: 30% > [2007-07-06 11:20:46,071, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:160: progress: 40% > [2007-07-06 11:27:54,927, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:160: progress: 50% > [2007-07-06 11:28:00,446, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:190: progress: 60% > [2007-07-06 11:28:05,898, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:190: progress: 70% > [2007-07-06 11:28:11,091, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:190: progress: 80% > [2007-07-06 11:28:16,030, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:190: progress: 90% > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,030, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:190: progress: 100% > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,040, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:285: Reparing missing node / > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,048, INFO ] {} > abbit.core.query.lucene.ConsistencyCheck:132: Repaired 1 errors. > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,050, INFO ] {} > jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex:318: Index initialized: > /foo/bar/repository/repository/index > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,072, INFO ] {} > jackrabbit.core.fs.local.LocalFileSystem:166: LocalFileSystem initialized at > path /foo/bar/repository/workspaces/default/index > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,149, INFO ] {} > he.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.Recovery:83: Found uncommitted redo log. > Applying changes now... > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,151, WARN ] {} > rabbit.core.query.lucene.PersistentIndex:86: Removing write lock on search > index. > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,280, INFO ] {} > he.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.Recovery:86: Redo changes applied. > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,282, INFO ] {} > jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex:298: Running consistency check... > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,475, WARN ] {} > jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex:315: Failed to run consistency check > on index: java.io.IOException: No such file or directory > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,477, INFO ] {} > jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex:318: Index initialized: > /foo/bar/repository/workspaces/default/index > [2007-07-06 11:28:21,478, INFO ] {} > rg.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl:329: Repository started > [2007-07-06 11:28:23,241, INFO ] {} > jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger:268: merged 12416 documents in 1919 > ms into _4n3i. > [2007-07-06 11:28:23,279, ERROR] {} > jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger:302: Error while merging indexes: > java.io.IOException: No such file or directory > A bit later while trying to commit a transaction the following exception was > logged: > [2007-07-06 11:29:09,797, ERROR] {} > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.SearchManager:427: Error indexing node. > java.io.IOException: No such file or directory > at java.io.UnixFileSystem.createFileExclusively(Native Method) > at java.io.File.createNewFile(File.java:883) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.FSDirectory$1.obtain(FSDirectory.java:119) > at org.apache.lucene.store.Lock.obtain(Lock.java:51) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.aquireWriteLock(IndexReader.java:489) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.deleteDocument(IndexReader.java:514) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.FilterIndexReader.doDelete(FilterIndexReader.java:132) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.deleteDocument(IndexReader.java:515) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.deleteDocuments(IndexReader.java:541) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.AbstractIndex.removeDocument(AbstractIndex.java:161) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.PersistentIndex.removeDocument(PersistentIndex.java:105) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.MultiIndex$DeleteNode.execute(MultiIndex.java:1729) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.MultiIndex.executeAndLog(MultiIndex.java:858) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.MultiIndex.update(MultiIndex.java:351) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex.updateNodes(SearchIndex.java:356) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.SearchManager.onEvent(SearchManager.java:423) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.observation.EventConsumer.consumeEvents(EventConsumer.java:231) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.observation.ObservationDispatcher.dispatchEvents(ObservationDispatcher.java:201) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.observation.EventStateCollection.dispatch(EventStateCollection.java:424) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.SharedItemStateManager$Update.end(SharedItemStateManager.java:721) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.XAItemStateManager.commit(XAItemStateManager.java:162) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.TransactionContext.commit(TransactionContext.java:172) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.XASessionImpl.commit(XASessionImpl.java:315) > [...] > This leads me to the assumption that one of those indexes listed in the field > "indexes" in MultiIndex was somehow deleted from the file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.