Hi Michi, > well, I want my local filesystem accessible via JCR and allowing me to > change files still with "vi(m)" from time to time. > Or do you consider that covered by A, B or C? But I guess my usecase is > probably neglectable as a usecase ... I usually use a webdav or an smb mount to be able to use vi directly on the repository instead of underneith it. Works very nicely with macosx.
> >.ps: of course i have a personal preference but i think my preference > >is well-known ;) > I don't ;-) what is your personal preference? I am not attached to the rdbms, if it brings no functionality from a content repository api user or maintenance perspective. So my personal preference is (C). I want my repository to be simple, fast, reliable and easy to deploy & maintain, but as I mentioned, I can see how others who have a much more db-oriented background feel differently. regards, david
