[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528684
]
Ard Schrijvers commented on JCR-1064:
-------------------------------------
Have been thinking this issue over, since I think it is quite important
performance improvement to get it right. I want to remove the part from the
MultiIndex constructor below resetVolatileIndex(); (thus the
Recovery.run(this, redoLog); and the rest) and move this in a seperate method,
which I call from the SearchIndex after the MultiIndex constructor and the test
for the index format.
WDOT?
> Optimize queries that check for the existence of a property
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1064
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1064
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: indexing
> Affects Versions: 1.3.1
> Reporter: Ard Schrijvers
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: JCR-1064-2.patch, JCR-1064-2.patch, JCR-1064-2.patch,
> JCR-1064-2.patch, JCR-1064-DEPR.patch
>
>
> //[EMAIL PROTECTED] is transformed into the
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.MatchAllQuery, that through the
> MatchAllWeight uses the MatchAllScorer. The calculateDocFilter() in
> MatchAllScorer does not scale and becomes slow for growing number of nodes.
> Solution: lucene documents will get a new Field:
> public static final String PROPERTIES_SET = "_:PROPERTIES_SET".intern();
> that holds the available properties of this document.
> NOTE: Lucene indices build without this performance improvement should still
> work and fall back to the original implementation
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
