Hi, On 11/1/07, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Proposal: document that getEvents only needs to accept EventFilter > objects created by the same SPI implementation for the same SessionInfo > (this reflects reality in JCR2SPI)
+1 There's no guarantee that a remote implementation can deserialize foreign EventFilters. > Proposal: remove special case in getEvents for EventFilter array being null. +1 One can achieve the same result using a catchall EventFilter. > These changes will allow the SPI implementation to early filter internal > events, even before getEvents() gets called. Nice. > Question: do we expect many cases in which a client stops listening for > events, but keeps the JCR session open? In this case it might be good if > we could indicate that an EventFilter is not going to be used anymore, > for instance using a dispose() method. I guess that's a relatively rare use case, so I'd just ignore it for simplicity. BR, Jukka Zitting
