Hi, [taking this thread from users@ to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 27, 2007 4:35 PM, Ard Schrijvers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am ATM not sure wether I can translate DASL into SQL (or at least > 95%)(XPATH). I think they don't totally match. Julian probably knows all the details... > Writing basic-search isn't to hard if I could translate it directly into > lucene queries, but...this of course it not a very nice thing todo, because > jackrabbit has this query grammar sets, but I really do not know how > they work (not sure if i want to learn about javacc) :-) How about exposing a "Lucene" query language at the Jackrabbit QueryManager level? This way a Jackrabbit-specific client could bypass the XPath or SQL parsing and issue queries directly against the underlying Lucene index. BR, Jukka Zitting
