Hi, The most important is to be able to read concurrently from the data store.
That should already work (using the pool). Does it not? We probably should have a test case for this feature. > The rest of the changes > are in the garbage collector The current garbage collector is quite basic. Extending is would be great - I just think the garbage collection should work the same way for all data store implementations (file system and database). > and the fact that I use a pooled data source for connections, so I need > a different way to create them. This feature may be interesting for others as well. >> do we wan't people not being able to extend Jackrabbit in this way? > > > > I think yes. > Sorry, I didn't read the 'not'. I think extending Jackrabbit should be possible. Regards, Thomas
