hi, On 4/12/08, Dave Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice that many of the classes in Jackrabbit lack a toString method. > Without them, it makes debugging code more difficult. My question is, is > that intentional? i don't think that this was intentional - just lazy :-) we added the toString() when needed.
> Did you want to avoid a problem of people using toString > for production code? no really. the toString() should only return debug text and never alter the state of the object. > Or would folks be ok if i added some? sure - go ahead. -- regards, toby
