Hi, On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 20.04.2008, 20:41 +0200 schrieb Julian Reschke: > > Furthermore, do you want to guarantee that future Jackrabbit versions > > will behave the same way? > > Agreed. And on an application level which deals with JCR and uses > Jackrabbit just because it is the best implementation available, I would > even stick with the JCR spec stating that Sessions need not be > thread-safe and thus assume Sessions are NOT thread-safe.
Agreed*2. There was earlier some discussion on explicitly synchronizing all JCR API calls on the related Session instance to ensure that none of the session-local data structures need to be thread-safe. BR, Jukka Zitting
