Hi, I would not create a 'temporary project'. A 'temporary package' is enough.
Regards, Thomas On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Angela Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> yes, that was the idea. alternatively we could also create an interim >> project module, jackrabbit-jsr283-api and drop that later. this way, >> we don't need to "clutter" the jackrabbit-api. > > i would prefer your second suggestions. we can then > state from the beginning that this is a temp. project > only and those using it will have to readjust their > code... > > angela >
