Hi, On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, but wouldn't this mean that let's say Jackrabbit 1.4.4 include > jcr-commons 1.4.3 given that commons hasn't changed in the meantime?
Correct. But that probably wouldn't be too troublesome, as if the user can actually pinpoint the problem to jcr-commons 1.4.3 (i.e. she looks below the top-level packaging or dependency), then the problem would already have occurred in the Jackrabbit 1.4.3 release. BR, Jukka Zitting
