[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617374#action_12617374 ]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on JCR-1672: --------------------------------------- I'm not sure what the best wording might be, but I think isExternal is "ok" - for me the opposite of isLocal would be isRemote :) > Adding Event interface and isLocal() > ------------------------------------ > > Key: JCR-1672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1672 > Project: Jackrabbit > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jackrabbit-api, jackrabbit-core > Affects Versions: 1.4 > Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler > Fix For: 1.5 > > Attachments: jackrabbit.patch, localeventlistener.patch > > > when a repository cluster is used, it seems that a common problem many people > have is to detect if an observation event is send because of changes on the > local instance or a remote instance of the cluster. > This is especially important if you want to do post processing of data > based on observation (the post processing should only be done by one instance > in the cluster). > A current solution is to cast the jcr event object to the EventImpl of > jackrabbit core which is obviously not a nice solution :) > So what about adding an event interface to jackrabbit api which extends the > jcr event interface and adds the isLocal() method? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.