Hello, I have also created an own AccessManager implementation ( http://jecars.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jecars/jecars_main/src/org/jecars/CARS_AccessManager.java?revision=1.18&view=markup )
I didn't implemented the checkPermission() method and until now I see no difference in the wanted behaviour. I think the isGranted() method is the main method. Greetings, Jacco On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:05 PM, pkrishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > I am exploring the possibility of providing node-level authorization for > READ, WRITE, REMOVE and ADD actions. Based on the many postings, I was able > to gather that I have to extend SimpleAccessManager and override > checkPermissions method that implements our domain-specific code. I > examined > SimpleAccessManager and other samples I was able to get at from the forum. > I > couldn't see the parameter ItemId being used anywhere. > > Do we have any examples how ItemId is used within the checkPermission > method? > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/AccessManager--checkPermissions-method-tp19880715p19880715.html > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- ------------------------------------- Jacco van Weert -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] JCR Controller -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~weertj/jcr JeCARS -- http://jecars.sourceforge.net
