ok. Thanks for your help. Christophe
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:27, Boni Gopalan (BioImagene) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Mapping file gives a good handle on guessing what the equivalent > node or property name is. I think the current mapping file has all the > information needed to do an OGNL like traversing of the Nodes. Will try > out a testcase to understand the challenges. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christophe Lombart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 October 2008 12:26 > To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org > Subject: Re: OCM:Supporting nested properties for the FilterImpl > > At present, this not possible but I think it should be nice to > implement > it. > > See the issue http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-878 (see the > latest > point in this issue). We can split this issue into smaller ones . > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:01, Boni Gopalan (BioImagene) < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The Filter is a nifty interface that allows hassle free construction > of > > JCR query strings through a Criterion() like methods. The default > > implementation does a remarkably accurate job of building queries that > > are one level deep. It would be great if the queries can be any level > > deep so that one can fetch back any specific 'Object' representation > of > > a node or a property. > > > > > > > > Eg. > > > > > > > > Foo{ > > > > String id; > > > > List<Bar> myBar; > > > > } > > > > > > > > Bar{ > > > > String id; > > > > String name; > > > > } > > > > > > > > Filter(Foo.class); [Not exactly but you get the idea!] > > > > Filter.addEqualsTo("myBar[].name"," C&A's Pub Pub"); > > > > > > > > Ocm.getObjects(Filter) , fetches all the Foos with a nested property > > name="C&A's Pub" > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? Is it possible with the current API?, > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Boni > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Boni Gopalan > > Manager Engineering > > BioImagene, Pune > > > > +91-206-609-6579(O) > > +91-992-369-9356(C) > > > > > > > > >
