[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12672288#action_12672288
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-1554:
----------------------------------------
Hi Philipp,
Not sure about this: since the change is very small and unlikely to cause
problems, I assume that a fix for this will be contained in 1.5.3, which should
be released quite soon. Are you already using 1.5 or able to upgrade?
Kind regards
Dominique
> StaleItemStateException with distributed transactions
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1554
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1554
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jackrabbit-core, transactions
> Affects Versions: 1.4, core 1.4.2
> Environment: WinXP, jdk1.5.0_14, jboss_4.2.2.GA, jackrabbit 1.4.2,
> spring 2.5.3, spring-modules-jcr 0.8 (for integration of jackrabbit with
> spring)
> PM of repository: OraclePersistenceManager; DB: Oracle
> Reporter: Sven Rieckhoff
> Attachments: jackrabbit-tx-bug.zip
>
>
> There seams to be a serious bug in jackrabbit when used in distributed
> transactions. It does not occur with local transactions! And it seams to be
> related to JCR-566.
> There are 2 scenarios where a StaleItemStateException occurs reproducible
> that causes transactions to fail. All my operations (implemented in a custom
> ServiceBean) such as setProperty() or deleteNode() run in separate
> transactions. The transactions are configured through Spring Annotations
> (@Transactional).
> Scenario A (setProperty):
> (1) multiple setProperty() with same property name on the same node (newly
> created or already existent)
> => With the 3. setProperty() (and sometimes also the 5.), a
> StaleItemStateException for the property state is raised when the transaction
> is commited. Following setProperty invocations will not fail!
> Scenario B (deleteNode):
> (1) iterate 10 times:
> (1.1) create new node n and a subnode for n
> (1.2) delete node n
> => Deletion of node n raises a StaleItemStateException for node n in
> iteration 1, 3 and (6 or 7), when the related transaction is commited.
> Following deletions of node n will also fail with a predictable pattern.
> The Exception trace for scenario A (it's the same for scenario B, with one
> difference: StaleItemStateException is raised for the node and not for the
> property):
> org.springframework.transaction.UnexpectedRollbackException: JTA transaction
> unexpectedly rolled back (maybe due to a timeout); nested exception is
> javax.transaction.RollbackException: Error during one-phase commit
> at
> org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager.doCommit(JtaTransactionManager.java:1031)
> at
> org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.processCommit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:709)
> at
> org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.commit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:678)
> at
> org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.commitTransactionAfterReturning(TransactionAspectSupport.java:321)
> at
> org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:116)
> at
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
> at
> org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
> at $Proxy9.setNodeProperty(Unknown Source)
> at
> de.zeb.control.prototype.jrTxBug.test.TestJackrabbitTxBug.testTransactionBug001(TestJackrabbitTxBug.java:97)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> at org.testng.internal.MethodHelper.invokeMethod(MethodHelper.java:580)
> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:478)
> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:607)
> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:874)
> at
> org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:125)
> at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:109)
> at org.testng.TestRunner.runWorkers(TestRunner.java:689)
> at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:566)
> at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:466)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:301)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:296)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:276)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:191)
> at org.testng.TestNG.createAndRunSuiteRunners(TestNG.java:808)
> at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:776)
> at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:701)
> at org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.run(RemoteTestNG.java:73)
> at org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.main(RemoteTestNG.java:124)
> Caused by: javax.transaction.RollbackException: Error during one-phase commit
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.TransactionImpl.commit(TransactionImpl.java:281)
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.TransactionManagerImpl.commit(TransactionManagerImpl.java:143)
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.context.InheritableTransactionContext.complete(InheritableTransactionContext.java:196)
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.context.InheritableTransactionContext.commit(InheritableTransactionContext.java:146)
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.context.OnlineUserTransaction.commit(OnlineUserTransaction.java:80)
> at
> org.jencks.factory.UserTransactionFactoryBean$GeronimoUserTransaction.commit(UserTransactionFactoryBean.java:118)
> at
> org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager.doCommit(JtaTransactionManager.java:1028)
> ... 30 more
> Caused by: javax.transaction.xa.XAException
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.TransactionContext.prepare(TransactionContext.java:155)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.XASessionImpl.commit(XASessionImpl.java:337)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.jca.TransactionBoundXAResource.commit(TransactionBoundXAResource.java:39)
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.WrapperNamedXAResource.commit(WrapperNamedXAResource.java:47)
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.TransactionImpl.commit(TransactionImpl.java:272)
> ... 36 more
> Caused by: org.apache.jackrabbit.core.TransactionException: Unable to prepare
> transaction.
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.XAItemStateManager.prepare(XAItemStateManager.java:150)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.TransactionContext.prepare(TransactionContext.java:138)
> ... 40 more
> Caused by: org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.StaleItemStateException:
> bef3c056-bc91-4195-a35c-aa184182b5ad/{}TEST_PROPERTY has been modified
> externally
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.SharedItemStateManager$Update.begin(SharedItemStateManager.java:620)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.SharedItemStateManager.beginUpdate(SharedItemStateManager.java:843)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.XAItemStateManager.prepare(XAItemStateManager.java:144)
> ... 41 more
> When debugging into jackrabbit you will see, that the cause of the
> StaleItemStateException is, that the local state und the overlayed state
> differ in the value of the 'modCount' attribute: modCount of local state is
> lower than modCount of overlayed state. Perhaps its a state caching problem...
>
> I'm attaching a simple java application configured with maven and ready to
> run standalone. The JCA container of JBoss is therefore replaced with jencks
> in order to support distributed transactions. The configured repository uses
> the InMemPersistenceManager. Both scenarios are implemented in a TestNG -
> test, that catches the occuring TransactionExceptions and prints out the
> stacktrace. Therefore you will see the exceptions, but the tests will not
> fail.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
