On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Florent Guillaume <f...@nuxeo.com> wrote: >> Jukka Zitting wrote: >>> Florent, would you and/or Nuxeo (depending on copyright ownership) be >>> willing to submit a software grant >>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt) covering the >>> Chemistry codebase? >> >> I sent the paperwork for general committer clearance to the Apache secretary >> some weeks ago. I have no problems sending another specific one for this >> codebase, I'll look at the URL you sent now. > > Cool, thanks! > >> On a related note, as I have a number of things I want to do in the coming >> days on this codebase (refactorings, addition of WS code, etc), what should >> I do to get svn access to the sandbox? > > The Jackrabbit PMC has discussed this already, and it seems like > everyone would be happy to have you as a committer. However, normally > we require some code-level interaction, i.e. patches, with an existing > committer before nominating someone for committership. Dominique's > import of the Chemistry codebase counts as one such interaction and > having you submit one or two patches against the current state of the > code should be enough to get you in as a committer. > > PS. We also discussed introducing a "sandbox committer" concept for > cases like this with a lower entry bar than standard committership, > but we didn't reach consensus on that so for now we're operating under > the above-mentioned standard path to committership.
sorry, jukka. that's not my understanding of the current discussion on the private list... cheers stefan > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >
