[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12738228#action_12738228
 ] 

Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-642:
-----------------------------------

> Do you think it is necessary to break the NodeState or PersistenceManager 
> interfaces?

Yes. NodeState is currently a class that's pretty difficult to subclass, and 
the PersistenceManager interface refers to it directly. If we change that (make 
NodeState an interface), we can just as well adjust the interfaces to better 
support the needs of this issue.

> Support flat content hierarchies
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-642
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-642
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jackrabbit-core
>            Reporter: Jukka Zitting
>
> The current best practice with Jackrabbit is to avoid flat content structures 
> due to performance concerns.
> These concerns are caused by the fact that the NodeState implementation 
> requires the list of child node names and identifiers to be available at all 
> times.  In fact many (all?) current persistence managers implement this 
> requirement by storing and loading this list as a part of the serialized node 
> state. When this list grows, the performance and memory overhead of managing 
> the list grows as well. As a side note, this also creates potential 
> consistency issues since the parent/child links are stored both within the 
> child list of the parent node and as the parent link of the child node.
> To solve this issue, I believe we need to break the tight bonding between the 
> node state and the list of child nodes. This will likely require major 
> refactoring of the Jackrabbit core, including breaking the NodeState and 
> PersistenceManager interfaces, so I don't expect a solution in near future. 
> However, we should start thinking about how to best do this, and at least be 
> concerned about building in any more assumptions about the list of child 
> nodes always being readily available.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to