[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12783083#action_12783083
 ] 

Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-1456:
----------------------------------------

> It would mean changing the current pm implementations. So pooling wouldn't be 
> optional.

ok, assuming that there are no known issues at this time:

-0 for merging it to trunk 

+1 for merging it to trunk if pooling would be an optional feature 
 
 



> Database connection pooling
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1456
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1456
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jackrabbit-core
>            Reporter: Jukka Zitting
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: 777490.patch, dbcp.patch, dbcp.patch, 
> JCR-1456-performance-trunk-test-setup.patch, JCR-1456-performance.txt, 
> JCR-1456.patch, patch-1456-1.txt, patch-1456-2.txt, patch-1456-3.txt
>
>
> Jackrabbit should use database connection pools instead of a single 
> connection per persistence manager, cluster journal, or database data store.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to