Jukka- Just to clarify, you're talking about Jackrabbit 3, not JCR 3, right?
Thanks, Justin On 2/17/10 10:11 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for all the responses to the repository requirements thread > (keep 'em coming)! That's very valuable information when we start > looking deeper at the architectural changes and tradeoffs ahead of us. > > The main concepts of the current Jackrabbit 1.x/2x. architecture date > back to almost a decade ago. During that time we've learned a lot more > about how content repositories are best used and implemented, and also > the underlying hardware technology has changed dramatically during > this time. Now that we're done implementing the new features and > changes for JCR 2.0, it's a good time to discuss what we can and > should make to modernize the Jackrabbit architecture. > > Instead of a single huge thread, I'm going to fire up a number of > parallel threads on specific ideas related to this. Feel free to add > your own ideas to the mix. Let's use the subject prefix [jr3] to make > these design threads easy to identify. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting
