On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Do you really think Jackrabbit should allow its core plugins to go > away at runtime? No, it's just one of OSGi feature doesn't need here.
> i don't mind providing osgi support at a higher level, the core however > should IMO not have any osgi-dependenciesi. +1 I would prefer to have our core implementation based on bean style pojo class. Thus we can have xml, OSGi, war, spring or whatever container to assembly for final runtime. > First of all, I would define an API for configuration changes. This > API could be the regular JCR API, and the configuration could be > stored in special "system" nodes. There are two kind of configuration apart from user data:node definition and repository definition. It's good to store node definition inside the repository and api to manage changes. But the repository configuration shouldn't go inside repository. Think about store db connection username/password inside repository. > Extensibility of the importXML and exportDocumentView methods come to mind. It may worth to redefine how we import/export. Xml should just be one of format we support. I am not confident to use xml to export/import GB/TB size data. ContentHandler could responsible for how the data should be export/imported. -Guo
