On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 13:28, Michael Dürig <michael.due...@day.com> wrote: > I like this approach. In general I think merging is very difficult if not > impossible at all to get right and will always be based on some assumptions > (intended semantics). I think we should not put this burden onto the > micro-kernel but rather leave it to higher levels (or even end users) to do > the/some merging.
Doing so wouldn't prevent a specific micro-kernel implementation from still trying to do a merge? Because I think this could still be interesting when following eventual consistency models with distributed cluster nodes. Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek alexander.klimetsc...@day.com