Hi Given as such, this looks promising, event though the prototype currently probably misses tasks that Jackrabbit currently does, right ? I am thinking of data validation against the node types when storing.
Regards Felix On 16.03.2010 19:46, Thomas Müller wrote: > Hi, > > I have some early performance test results: There is a test with 3 > levels of child nodes (each node 20 children) > (TestSimple.createReadNodes). > > With the JDBC storage and the H2 database, this is about 14 times > faster than the Jackrabbit 2.0 trunk (0.2 seconds versus 2.9 seconds > for Jackrabbit 2.0). This is after 3 test runs. The storage space > usage is about 1/3 (2.8 MB for the prototype versus 9.5 MB for > Jackrabbit 2.0). > > Regards, > Thomas >
