[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004486#comment-13004486
 ] 

Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-2911:
------------------------------------

I guess what Angela is saying here is that we already have some ideas on how to 
implement this in the context of the existing access control mechanism. Your 
proposed approach is a bit different and leaves the actual implementation 
undefined. Also, there are some stylistic issues like star imports and the use 
of type casts that make the patch a bit troublesome. And unit tests would be 
good...

If you're interested in working on this, I suggest you start by discussing in 
JCR-2774 and it's subtasks about what a good implementation would look like. 
Once there's a consensus on how this should be implemented we can move on to 
patches.

> Fine-grained access control for managing node types
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-2911
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2911
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: jackrabbit-core, nodetype
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.4, 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Omid Milani
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: accessManager, nodetype, security
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: accessManager_nodeTypes.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 5m
>  Remaining Estimate: 5m
>
> Extend AccessManager interface to include authorization for 
> register/unregister of node types so it can be defined that a certain user 
> can define and modify some node types but not the others.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to