On 20.6.12 16:04, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2012-06-20 17:01, Michael Dürig wrote:
...
...
Spec. wise this is fine. Implementation wise I'm not convinced. Who
cares about the descriptors anyway ;-) Not even the TCK does... However
let's leave it at this for the time being. I think this feature is
rarely used if at all and we should concentrate on the important stuff
first.
...
I don't think it's fine spec-wise. I also recall using it in the
remoting layer to get the "non-local" filtering mode working.
Don't quote me out of context ;-) I referred to
"If needed, we could propose to JSR 333 to relax the specified
observation contract or at to introduce more fine-grained descriptors
that allow an implementation like ours to declare at least some
observation functionality as supported."
wrt. this I meant it to be fine spec. wise.
Michael
Best regards, Julian
