[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13605083#comment-13605083
 ] 

Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-3534:
----------------------------------------

> but is the overhead high enough to justify the leak in the abstraction

well, copying lots of 20MB binaries ? instead of lots of 50 character strings ? 
Do the math ;-)

The abstraction already leaked with the JackrabbitValue.getContentIdentitiy 
method (ok, that would be the broken window ;-) ).
                
> Add JackrabbitSession.getValueByContentId method
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-3534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: jackrabbit-api, jackrabbit-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.6
>            Reporter: Felix Meschberger
>         Attachments: JCR-3534.patch
>
>
> we have a couple of use cases, where we would like to leverage the global 
> data store to prevent sending around and copying around large binary data 
> unnecessarily: We have two separate Jackrabbit instances configured to use 
> the same DataStore (for the sake of this discussion assume we have the 
> problems of concurrent access and garbage collection under control). When 
> sending content from one instance to the other instance we don't want to send 
> potentially large binary data (e.g. video files) if not needed.
> The idea is for the sender to just send the content identity from 
> JackrabbitValue.getContentIdentity(). The receiver would then check whether 
> the such content already exists and would reuse if so:
> String ci = contentIdentity_from_sender;
> try {
>     Value v = session.getValueByContentIdentity(ci);
>     Property p = targetNode.setProperty(propName, v);
> } catch (ItemNotFoundException ie) {
>     // unknown or invalid content Identity
> } catch (RepositoryException re) {
>     // some other exception
> }
> Thus the proposed JackrabbitSession.getValueByContentIdentity(String) method 
> would allow for round tripping the JackrabbitValue.getContentIdentity() 
> preventing superfluous binary data copying and moving. 
> See also the dev@ thread 
> http://jackrabbit.markmail.org/thread/gedk5jsrp6offkhi

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to