[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13654419#comment-13654419
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on JCR-3534:
--------------------------------------
> no, you got that right... i don't want to block the cq release if there is no
> other solution right now. but i would like us to discuss
already today if there was really no other way and how we are going to address
this in OAK before we ship that feature.
therefore i was somehow waiting for a confirmation that my concern has been
noticed.
sure, I agree and will be happy to discuss a proper way to handle that in Oak
> if we end up with releasing it with that entry in the repository.xml, i would
> like to see us having at least a FIXME comment
associated with the repository.xml as this is not secure at all.... currently
it states "a very well kept secret"... that's sort of
a joke given the fact that the repository.xml is almost accessible to everyone
:-)
right :-)
> Efficient copying of binaries across repositories with the same data store
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-3534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: jackrabbit-api, jackrabbit-core
> Affects Versions: 2.6
> Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
> Attachments: JCR-3534.2.patch, JCR-3534.3.patch, JCR-3534.4.patch,
> JCR-3534.patch, JCR-3534.patch
>
>
> we have a couple of use cases, where we would like to leverage the global
> data store to prevent sending around and copying around large binary data
> unnecessarily: We have two separate Jackrabbit instances configured to use
> the same DataStore (for the sake of this discussion assume we have the
> problems of concurrent access and garbage collection under control). When
> sending content from one instance to the other instance we don't want to send
> potentially large binary data (e.g. video files) if not needed.
> The idea is for the sender to just send the content identity from
> JackrabbitValue.getContentIdentity(). The receiver would then check whether
> the such content already exists and would reuse if so:
> String ci = contentIdentity_from_sender;
> try {
> Value v = session.getValueByContentIdentity(ci);
> Property p = targetNode.setProperty(propName, v);
> } catch (ItemNotFoundException ie) {
> // unknown or invalid content Identity
> } catch (RepositoryException re) {
> // some other exception
> }
> Thus the proposed JackrabbitSession.getValueByContentIdentity(String) method
> would allow for round tripping the JackrabbitValue.getContentIdentity()
> preventing superfluous binary data copying and moving.
> See also the dev@ thread
> http://jackrabbit.markmail.org/thread/gedk5jsrp6offkhi
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
