[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13659715#comment-13659715
]
Alexander Klimetschek edited comment on JCR-3534 at 5/16/13 5:08 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
@Tommaso: if storing the key is always data-store specific (such as a special
file in the FileDataStore, which is by far the most important data store, not
sure if anyone is using the slow database data store), you only need a
getSecret() method on the AbstractDataStore class. See my post from above:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?focusedCommentId=13653621&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13653621
was (Author: alexander.klimetschek):
@Tommaso: if the key is always stored data-store specific (such as a
special file in the FileDataStore, which is by far the most important data
store, not sure if anyone is using the slow database data store), you only need
a getSecret() method on the AbstractDataStore class. See my post from above:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?focusedCommentId=13653621&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13653621
> Efficient copying of binaries across repositories with the same data store
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-3534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: jackrabbit-api, jackrabbit-core
> Affects Versions: 2.6
> Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
> Attachments: JCR-3534.2.patch, JCR-3534.3.patch, JCR-3534.4.patch,
> JCR-3534.6.patch, JCR-3534.patch, JCR-3534.patch
>
>
> we have a couple of use cases, where we would like to leverage the global
> data store to prevent sending around and copying around large binary data
> unnecessarily: We have two separate Jackrabbit instances configured to use
> the same DataStore (for the sake of this discussion assume we have the
> problems of concurrent access and garbage collection under control). When
> sending content from one instance to the other instance we don't want to send
> potentially large binary data (e.g. video files) if not needed.
> The idea is for the sender to just send the content identity from
> JackrabbitValue.getContentIdentity(). The receiver would then check whether
> the such content already exists and would reuse if so:
> String ci = contentIdentity_from_sender;
> try {
> Value v = session.getValueByContentIdentity(ci);
> Property p = targetNode.setProperty(propName, v);
> } catch (ItemNotFoundException ie) {
> // unknown or invalid content Identity
> } catch (RepositoryException re) {
> // some other exception
> }
> Thus the proposed JackrabbitSession.getValueByContentIdentity(String) method
> would allow for round tripping the JackrabbitValue.getContentIdentity()
> preventing superfluous binary data copying and moving.
> See also the dev@ thread
> http://jackrabbit.markmail.org/thread/gedk5jsrp6offkhi
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
