Robert Munteanu created JCR-3666: ------------------------------------ Summary: FileVault: VaultFsConfig11 references incorrect classes from prior versions Key: JCR-3666 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3666 Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository Issue Type: Bug Components: jackrabbit-jcr-commons Reporter: Robert Munteanu Priority: Minor
I stumbled upon this by accident, so I can't say whether this has unintended side effects or not, but just to make sure... VaultFsConfig11 references classes from prior mappings {code} Map<String, String> m = helper.getMappings(); m.put("org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.imprt.FolderArtifactHandler", "org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.impl.io.FileArtifactHandler"); m.put("org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.imprt.FileArtifactHandler", "org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.impl.io.FileArtifactHandler"); m.put("org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.imprt.GenericArtifactHandler", "org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.impl.io.GenericArtifactHandler"); m.put("org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.imprt.NodeTypeArtifactHandler", "org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.impl.io.NodeTypeArtifactHandler"); m.put("org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.filter.ItemFilter", "org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.api.ItemFilter"); m.put("org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.filter.PathFilter", "org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.api.PathFilter"); {code} But since there was no prior org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.imprt package, I guess that this is incorrect, and that the mappings should include both the previous class names and the class names which were in effect before FileVault was donated. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira