Hi, On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > What are our expections with respect to certain normalizations of node names > a repository *might* do, such as:
>From the implementation perspective: I think such concerns should be taken care of on a level above the repository. At best I'd see the repository enforcing a particular naming policy by refusing to create content with un-normalized names. >From the client perspective: I guess a client should be prepared for a repository that actively does normalize names, as I don't think the spec rules something like that out and as the spec was written in a way that would allow it to be implemented on top of existing backends that already may do such normalization. In practice that would probably mean that a Node returned from getNode() or addNode() might not have the exact same name as the one given as the argument. BR, Jukka Zitting
