[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14004613#comment-14004613
 ] 

Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3239:
----------------------------------------

Philipp, I'm unable to reproduce this on latest jackrabbit trunk (2.8), could 
you provide a test case or explain how you created the stream you reimport with 
{{getImportXML}}?

> Removal of a top level node doesn't update the hierarchy manager's cache.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-3239
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3239
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jackrabbit-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.11, 2.4
>            Reporter: Philipp Bärfuss
>
> *Problem*
> Scenario in which I encounter the problem:
> - given a node 'test' under root (/test)
> - re-imported the node after a deletion (all in-session operations) 
> {code}
> session.removeItem("/test")
> session.getImportXML("/", stream, 
> ImportUUIDBehavior.IMPORT_UUID_COLLISION_THROW)
> {code}
> Result: throws an ItemExistsException
> If the same operations are executed deeper in the hierarchy (for instance 
> /foo/bar) then the code works perfectly fine.
> *Findings*
> - session.removeItem informs the hierachy manager (via listener)
> --> CachingHierarchyManager.nodeRemoved(NodeState, Name, int, NodeId)
> - but the root node (passed as state) is not in the cache and hence the entry 
> of the top level node is not removed
> --> CachingHierarchyManager: 458 
> - while trying to import the method SessionImporter.startNode(NodeInfo, 
> List<PropInfo>) calls session.getHierarchyManager().getName(id) (line 400)
> - the stall information causes a uuid collision (the code expects an 
> exception if the node doesn't exist but in this case it returns the name of 
> the formerly removed node)
> Note: session.itemExists() and session.getNode() work as expected (the former 
> returns false, the later throws an ItemNotFound exception)
> Note: I know that a different import behavior (replace existing) would solve 
> the issue but I can't be 100% sure that the UUID match so I favor collision 
> throw in my case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to